Agricultural SubsidiesAgriculture PolicyGM Crops

Chief Economic Adviser Speaks Up for Trade in Animals for Slaughter, Patent Rights on Plant Traits

Photo by Vivian Fernandes

“If the terminal value of livestock assets declines it will make livestock farming uneconomical.”  That was Chief Economic Adviser, Arvind Subramanian’s camouflaged way of saying that if impediments were created in the sale of cattle and buffaloes for slaughter, the dairying industry would suffer. He had to be circumspect given the reverence that leaders of the government he serves in, have for bovines. He was referring to the rules for regulation of animal markets which the environment ministry had notified about a week ago. These says that cattle, including buffaloes, traded in animal markets cannot be slaughtered.

Subramanian said such a policy would also affect “social capital.” If the number of stray cattle increased because of the ban on trade for slaughter, the incidence of afflictions like foot and mouth diseases spreading from such abandoned and weak animals would increase.

The CEA was giving the foundation day lecture of the National Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Delhi.

Touching on another sensitive subject, the CEA said “expropriating property rights retroactively and not respecting contracts” would harm farmers. He was perhaps referring to last year’s price control order of the agriculture ministry, which denies pricing freedom to the patent-holders of genetically-modified (GM) plant traits like insect resistance. The ministry is now trying to deny them licensing freedom as well.

The CEA said efforts have to be made to “ensure there is no abuse of monopolistic positions,” adding that India had tools like competition policy to tackle such abuses.

The cost-benefit analysis of GM crop technology must be done by farmers, he said, alluding to the tendency of anti-GM technology activists to speak for them.

Subramanian said India must love cereals less and love pulses, oilseeds, fruit and vegetables and livestock farming more. Pulses and oilseeds, he said, were socially-useful crops as they consumed less of subsidized fertilizer and also enriched the soil with nitrogen from the air. They were more nutritious too.

The CEA said agriculture needed “more hard-nosed realism than woolly romanticization of the Indian farmer.”

More people would have to give up agriculture. At the same time technology would have to make it more productive, profitable and climate resilient.

(Top photo of Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian giving the NAAS foundation day lecture. Photo by Vivian Fernandes)


Related posts
Agriculture PolicyBt technology

Can India, the Largest Producer of Milk, Become Globally Competitive as Well?

India’s dairy policy must be driven by commercial considerations and not sentiment, allowing…
Read more
Agriculture Policy

Farmers’ Leaders Blocking Reforms Citing Economist Ashok Gulati's Study: NITI Aayog's Ramesh Chand

An influential Delhi-based agricultural economist’s study that says Indian farmers bore an…
Read more
Agriculture PolicyBt technology

Interest in Ayurvedic Health Supplements Peaked During the Pandemic; It Has Plateaued at a Higher Level: Somit Mukherjee, CPO, Dabur India

There was a good supply response to increased demand for medicinal herbs and aromatic plants owing…
Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.