Agri-biotechnologyAgriculture PolicyBriefing

GEAC to Ask Deepak Pental for GM Mustard to be Tested on Honeybees: Release Decision Effectively Postponed to the Next Government

Deepak Pental's experimental mustard plant at South Campus, Delhi University. Photo by Vivian Fernandes.

Having recommended release of GM mustard to farmers last May, the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) should have told environment minster Harsh Vardhan it has no reason to reconsider the adverse representations. The minister would have been forced to take a decision either for or against. The GEAC has given him wiggle room and bailed this government out, reports Vivian Fernandes  

After a gap of nine months the GEAC met on 21 March. GM mustard was one of the items on the agenda. Despite the GEAC recommending approval for cultivation to the environment minister last May, Harsh Vardhan has not taken a decision. Instead, he wanted the GEAC to review the representations he had received against the genetically-modified hybrid, even though it had given ample time to the anti-GM activists and had decided that the technology was safe, an advancement over conventional methods of producing mustard hybrids and therefore beneficial for both farmers and the nation.

To allay any residual fears about damage to the environment, the GEAC has decided to ask the developers, that is, geneticist Deepak Pental and his team of scientists from Delhi University to conduct a trial on the impact on honeybees. The GEAC had earlier recommended this post-release of the mustard hybrid. Now it will be done before. This will have to happen during the coming winter season and will require the GM mustard field to be isolated from other mustard areas.

Effectively  a decision on GM mustard has been postponed to the next government. Supporters of GM mustard will see this as a setback though the more optimistic among them will be gratified that the issue has not been shelved.

There is no scientific reason to hold back release of GM mustard. All the protocols have been followed and it has been declared safe.  Harsh Vardhan either does not support the technology or he does not want to take on lobbies like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch.

The twists and turns that GM mustard has had to negotiate makes one wonder whether scientific evidence at all informs decision-making in this government.

(Top photo of Deepak Pental’s experimental mustard plat at Delhi’s University’s South Campus by Vivian Fernandes).

Related posts
Briefing

Why Paddy Stubble Burning Could Aggravate Pollution This Year Compared to Earlier Years

Paddy stubble burning, when farmers in Punjab and Haryana prepare fields for wheat planting, by…
Read more
Agriculture Policy

Is Food Price Inflation Transitory And Should It Be Ignored For Calculating Core Inflation? Two Experts Say No

Should the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) ignore food price increases while trying to bring inflation…
Read more
Agriculture Policy

Are Organic Fruits, Vegetables and Cereals Worth the Higher Price? This is What NYT Has to Say

In 2022, organics accounted for 15 percent of fruits and vegetable sales in the United States, being…
Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *