Agriculture PolicyBriefing

Same Party Government in UP as at the Centre is an Opportunity for Cane Pricing Reform

A cane field in Sangli, Maharashtra. Photo by Vivian Fernandes

The same party voted to rule Uttar Pradesh as the centre is an opportunity to fix the endemic problem of cane arrears, reports Rural Affairs Editor Harish Damodaran in the Indian Express.

Ajay Shriram, Joint Managing Director DCM Shriram which has four sugar mills in Uttar Pradesh says the time is opportune to reform cane pricing by linking it with sugar realisations, as recommended by former Reserve Bank Governor C Rangarjan in a report presented to the previous government at the centre.

The Rangarajan committee had recommended that cane price should be 75 percent of the ex-factory price of sugar. At Rs 3,675 a quintal of sugar, cane prices should be Rs 274 a quintal (based on a sugar recovery rate of 10.5 percent), which is higher than the centre’s ‘fair and remunerative’ rate of Rs 254.20 a quintal. But it is below the state advised price (SAP) of Rs 305 a quintal.

Farmer leader and convenor of the Rashtriya Kisan Mazdoor Sangathan, V M Singh, however opposes the Rangarajan formula. If millers wants sugar price to be a cane price plus a premium, the cost plus formula should apply to cane prices as well, he says. The Rangarajan formula is fine for Maharashtra where the costs of harvesting cane and transporting it to the factories are paid by the mills. In Uttar Pradesh, farmers have to bear these costs.

So far in the October 2016-September 2017 sugar season, Damodaran reports Uttar Pradesh’s mills have bought cane worth Rs 20,473 cr at SAP. Of this they were supposed to pay Rs 18,264 cr within 14 days. They have paid Rs 14,345 or Rs 3,919 cr less. There are arrears of Rs 255 cr and Rs 44 cr of the previous two seasons also outstanding.

UP’s earlier Samajwadi Party government had waived off interest on cane arrears pertaining to three sugar seasons – 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15. On 9 March, the Allahabad High Court set aside the government’s decision saying that the amount waived – Rs 2,000 cr was “totally lop-sided/one way” and taken with “no application of mind.” The court said the state government had the right to waive off interest in exceptional situations but could not do so in a “routine manner.”  The court said interest was a “substantive right and not a bounty” to cane growers.

To read the full story click here.

(Top photo: a cane field in Sangli, Maharashtra. Uttar Pradesh is set to dislodge Maharashtra from its pole position as sugar producer because of poor harvest this year. Photo by Vivian Fernandes)

Related posts
Agriculture Policy

Congress Manifesto Should Have Promised Income Support to Smallholder Farmers Rather than Legal Backing for MSP

This article by Vivian Fernandes in The Congress Party’s promise to farmers in its…
Read more
Agriculture Policy

Peace Clause Will Not Buy Durable Peace for India at the WTO, Analyst Says

The ‘peace clause’ agreed at the  9th ministerial conference (MC) of the World Trade…
Read more
Agriculture Policy

Any Crop Combination That Doesn't Include Paddy is Not the Most Profitable

Even if there is assured procurement at minimum support prices (MSP) of other crops, any combination…
Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *